Jay Cutler. SEVEN years?
BY RICK MORRISSEY email@example.com January 2, 2014 12:16PM
- Interactive graphic: Pro Football Focus rates Jay Cutler in 2013
- Jay Cutler signs 7-year deal and Twitter reacts
- Cutler: Packers' Rodgers got star treatment
- Bears sign Cutler to 7-year deal
Updated: January 2, 2014 8:15PM
Seven years. Is it something we said, Phil Emery?
Jay Cutler has signed a contract that could keep him with the Bears through 2020. Man, that’s a lot of Jay. A lot of scowls, sweet passes, maddening decisions, toughness and mumbled answers.
Those of you who hate him will find him no more likable.
Those of you who like him will continue to like him, but true love is probably out of the question.
All of us are stuck with him, for better or for worse, until death or suicide do us part.
So, deep breath. Seven years.
We can get all full of ourselves and declare that Cutler now must hold up his end of the bargain, but those are empty words. He held up his end enough to get a sweet contract. Emery, the general manager, likes Cutler just the way he is or he wouldn’t have given him that long of a deal.
At first glance, the length of the contract seems excessive. It looks like a big “how’s that feel?” from the franchise to the portion of the fan base that thinks Cutler is the Antichrist. Seven years seems to be saying, “You’ll eat what we ladle out to you. And like it.’’
But the length is a salary cap decision more than anything. The more years, the less impact the contract has on the cap, giving the Bears more money to address their atrocious defense.
They believe they can win a championship with Cutler. Whether that’s real or a result of their mind playing tricks is up for debate. I don’t happen to believe they can win a Super Bowl with him running the offense. He’s too mercurial on the field – too many rash decisions, too many footballs thrown toward windows the size of peepholes. Forget the bad body language and his irritability around the media. Doesn’t matter much in this discussion.
The Bears can’t win a Super Bowl with someone as erratic as Cutler, no matter how soothing the voice of Trestman, “the Horse Whisperer,’’ might be in his ear.
But — and this “but’’ is as big as B.J. Raji’s butt — they had to sign him. Emery needs to focus on getting the defense right, and this is no time to be looking for a quarterback who is as good as Cutler. Sorry, Josh McCown fans, your guy is not a short- or long-term answer. A Cutler-led offense with Brandon Marshall, Alshon Jeffery, Martellus Bennett and Matt Forte isn’t the problem.
I used to be on the side of signing Cutler only if you think you can win a Super Bowl with him. But circumstances and a record-setting (not in a good way) defense slapped me out of that thinking. There isn’t a better alternative to Cutler.
What we can say with certainty on a big day for the Bears and their future is that there is no mystery here. Everybody knows what he’s getting with Cutler. He’s 30. He’s unlikely to go backward under coach Marc Trestman, but the chances of him turning into Peyton Manning are zero.
Seven years. By the way, Cutler said Monday that there had been no contract talks to that point. So that was some progress the team and his agent made in three days on a seven-year contract. Cough, cough. Something tells me there might have been some “groundwork’’ done in the weeks and months leading up to Thursday’s announcement.
Whatever the case, here we are, Chicago and Cutler, with a long time to regard each other. Has there been one athlete who has brought out such industrial-strength mixed emotions in this city?
Offhand, I can’t think of one.
Seven more years of Jay. The football observer in me says to the Bears, “It’s your funeral.’’ The columnist in me says, “Thank you.’’