Back to regular view     Print this page

Subscribe   •   EasyPay   •   e-paper
Reader Rewards   •   Customer Service

Weather: LETDOWN
Become a member of our community!

Lynn Sweet
Blogs
News
Columnists
 


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Lynn Sweet
Print Article Email Article Share / Bookmark




TOP STORIES ::
Artist behind iconic album art struggling to get by

Joyful lottery ad a winner

CLAWLESSAND CLUELESS

Ciao, Bella: 'New Moon' stars talk about breakup

Bright ideas: Making daily life easier for elderly







Obama 'outraged' at Iran

Rips violence, but sends message that Iranians control their future, not U.S.

June 24, 2009

WASHINGTON -- When President Obama strongly condemned the violence in Iran on Tuesday -- cranking up his rhetoric, perhaps enough to satisfy critics who said earlier comments were too tentative -- he also sent the message to Iran that the U.S. had nothing to do with the Internet-fueled uprisings in Tehran and the fate of the nation was in Iranians' hands.

Obama opened his fourth White House press conference by declaring Tuesday afternoon he was "appalled and outraged" by the Iranian government crackdown in the wake of a disputed June 12 presidential election. He said he saw the video of the murder of "Neda," the 26-year-old gunned down, presumably by the Iranian government, and said, "It's heartbreaking. It's heartbreaking. And I think that anybody who sees it knows that there's something fundamentally unjust about that."

The president wanted to talk directly to Iran, calling on an editor from the Huffington Post, Nico Pitney, knowing the Web outlet had been soliciting questions online from Iranians. The White House phoned Pitney Monday saying he might be called on and was physically pre-positioned in the crowded White House briefing room by a White House spokesman, Josh Earnest, so the president could find him when his name was called.

But the inside story of how the White House choreographed the Huffington Post question is overwhelmed by the message Obama wanted to send out to the Iranian youths on the streets of Tehran, who are witnessing their revolution play out on the Web.

Even though the Iranian government has tried to curb cell phone videos and still pictures, Twitter messages and e-mail exchanges, the social networking tools of the Internet have helped organize demonstrations and send information out to the world.

"Would you accept the election of Ahmadinejad?" Pitney asked. "And if you do accept it without any significant changes in the conditions there, isn't that a betrayal of what the demonstrators there are working towards?"

Obama said what's important is for the Iranians -- not the U.S. -- to consider the election legitimate.

"A sizeable percentage of the Iranian people themselves, spanning Iranian society, consider this election illegitimate. It's not an isolated instance -- a little grumbling here or there. There is significant questions about the legitimacy of the election. And so ultimately the most important thing for the Iranian government to consider is legitimacy in the eyes of its own people, not in the eyes of the United States," Obama said.

Obama emphasized during his press conference he wants to keep the U.S. out of the developing story, though of course the world is watching and waiting for Obama's responses, especially if the violence continues. That's a reason, I think, he did not come out forcefully on the side of the protesters days ago. It's important to the Obama team to not be seen as managing the outcome of this unexpected crisis.

Said Obama, "My role has been to say the United States is not going to be a foil for the Iranian government to try to blame what's happening on the streets of Tehran on the CIA or on the White House, that this is an issue that is led by and given voice to the frustrations of the Iranian people."