Weather Updates

Steinberg: Dear IOC, sorry yet on Rio choice?

Military police detaman during an anti-government protest Rio de Janeiro Brazil Thursday June 20 2013. | AP Photo

Military police detain a man during an anti-government protest in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Thursday, June 20, 2013. | AP Photo

storyidforme: 52500581
tmspicid: 19010243
fileheaderid: 8584139
Article Extras
Story Image

Updated: July 31, 2014 2:59PM

Dear International Olympic Committee:

Howdy! Long time no talk to. Four years. Where does the time go?

I know you’ve probably forgotten about Chicago, ever since you gave us the backhand in fall 2009, and in the first round no less.

But we remember. Yes, we do. What Chicagoan who stood in those crowds — dressed in our civic best, as it were, holding a hand-picked bouquet, gussied up to the tune of $50 million in city-buffing money, waiting, eager for the good news — can remember the deflating letdown, the shocking dismissal, the confetti trickling out of our slack fingers into the street, watching benumbed as Madrid, Rio and Tokyo skipped onward without us.


And in case you are tempted to ascribe this to bitterness, we’ll happily note that the Olympic games are three years away, so everything could still work well. Hard to imagine, but it’s possible. The protests rocking Brazil — hundreds of thousands of people, in 100 cities last month, the streets of Rio in flames this week — could ebb, and everything could somehow be fine in 2016. We add our sincere hopes and prayers that it will be so to those of the world.

Although one little question keeps waving its hand over its head, going “oh oh oh!” and begging to be asked. So I’m just going to call upon that question and be done with it. Ready? Here’s our question:

Sorry yet?

Because you could have had Chicago. Which isn’t a city without problems. Lots of problems. Streets in certain neighborhoods raked with deadly gunfire every weekend. Pension giveaways one straw away from cracking the government’s back. School teachers laid off by the thousands. And I’m sure, had we gotten the 2016 Olympics, as we should have, there would have been grumbling aplenty about hosting a big quadrennial party for the world’s athletic elites in the midst of all our concerns.

But I bet we could have done it without firebombs. Without the military breaking out the tear gas and the rubber bullets. I bet our population wouldn’t rise up against the Olympics, the way they’re doing in Brazil, which is also upset about hosting the World Cup in 2014.

Chicago hosted the World Cup, along with eight other cities, in 1994, which was such a non-crisis to us that I bet a lot of people who were around then don’t even remember it. I do — it was hot. That’s it. A city like ours knows how to do this kind of thing. We planned a victory party for several million Blackhawks fans in, what, three days? Tear gas proved unnecessary.

No hard feelings, IOC. Maybe next time, assuming we feel like going through all the bother to try to win your silly Olympics. But I don’t expect that. Most Chicagoans, rather than yearn toward our lost Olympics, are glad. We got off light, and now can get to sit back and watch Brazil try to manage the task, which might be more fun than hosting would have been. You can’t say you didn’t have your chance. And you blew it. You could have had gold, but settled for bronze.


Neil Steinberg

© 2014 Sun-Times Media, LLC. All rights reserved. This material may not be copied or distributed without permission. For more information about reprints and permissions, visit To order a reprint of this article, click here.