FILE - In this June 6, 2012, file photo, Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., speaks about a farm bill on Capitol Hill in Washington. Senate Agriculture Committee chairman Stabenow is fond of saying that the five-year farm policy bill is "not your father's farm bill." There's some truth to that: while the core missions of farm bills _ protecting farmers from bad times, conserving rural lands and funding the food stamp and other nutrition programs _ are unchanged, this farm bill takes some very different approaches. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate on Thursday completed a five-year, half-trillion-dollar farm bill that cuts farm subsidies and land conservation spending by about $2 billion a year but largely protects sugar growers
The vote was 65-34. The measure now goes to the Republican-led House where conservatives are certain to resist its costs.
Eighty percent of the farm bill supports a program of food subsidies that benefit some 46 million poor and low income families.
Farm subsidies often become a stumbling block in international trade negotiations. Developing countries say the subsidies drive down prices reducing the income they derive when these nations sell their products.
While transforming the subsidy system, the Senate left intact the sugar program that for some 80 years has protected beet and sugarcane growers and sugar refiners by controlling prices and limiting imports.
The program is opposed by consumer groups and food and beverage companies that use sugar. They say it drives up costs and leads to confectioners relocating overseas. Amendments to either phase out or narrow the scope of the sugar program both failed on close votes.
While overall spending on programs covered by the bill has climbed because more people are receiving help buying food, the committee head, Sen. Debbie Stabenow, a Democrat, and the top Republican, Sen. Pat Roberts, said the bill would save $23 billion over the next 10 years compared with spending under the current farm bill that expires in September.
That comes from replacing four farm commodity subsidy programs with one, consolidating 23 conservation programs into 13.
The biggest change comes from eliminating direct payments to farmers whether they plant crops or not. The program, which costs about $5 billion a year, has lost much of its support at a time of $1 trillion federal deficits and when farmers in general are prospering.
The bill also prevents farm “managers,” often wealthy people who may not live or work on a farm, from receiving subsidy payments and gives greater help to fruit and vegetable producers and healthy food programs.
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack praised the Senate bill for making progress toward “providing a reformed safety net for producers in times of needs,” supporting agriculture research, conserving natural resources, strengthening local food systems and promoting jobs. He expressed hope the House “will produce a bill with those same goals in mind.”
Rep. Frank Lucas, the Republican chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, said that while there will be differences between the House and Senate approaches, “I hope my colleagues are encouraged by this success.” His committee is scheduled to meet on July 11 to vote on a House version of the bill.