suntimes
PROPER 
Weather Updates

Jury rejects woman’s claims ex-husband abused her as ‘sex slave’

Kimberly O'Brien KevJ. Anderson

Kimberly O'Brien and Kevin J. Anderson

storyidforme: 51031184
tmspicid: 18851391
fileheaderid: 8499988

Updated: July 22, 2013 6:59PM



It was a marriage that lasted only three months.

But it generated a seven-year legal battle so bitter it ended up in federal court.

And when it was finally done Thursday evening, Gold Coast resident Kim O’Brien didn’t get a single cent out of the multi-millionaire ex-husband she’d sued for allegedly holding her against her will as a “sex slave.”

A jury took just four hours to reject the 52-year-old’s claims that wealthy Wisconsin businessman Kevin Anderson, 57, intentionally emotionally abused her and tied her up, gagged, beat and raped her during an unwanted introduction to the world of bondage, submission and sadomasochism on their California honeymoon in 2005.

The four men and four women jurors instead found it more likely that O’Brien was a “gold digger... motivated by greed” who’d enjoyed kinky sex and had lied about the abuse, as Anderson’s lawyer argued.

O’Brien — who endured repeated innuendos during the two-week trial suggesting she was a prostitute, and was shown naked, bound, blindfolded and spanked in humiliating photos displayed for jurors — pursed her lips and raised her eyebrows as the verdict was announced.

Wearing dark sunglasses, she quickly left the courthouse without comment. Her ex-husband had already returned to Wisconsin and was not in court to hear the verdict.

Earlier Thursday, lawyers for both sides told competing accounts of the couple’s deeply dysfunctional romance, which began when they met in Aspen, Colo., in 2000, saw Anderson shower O’Brien with luxury gifts and expensive trips before he proposed in a Michigan Avenue church in 2005, and ended in divorce soon after.

Representing O’Brien, Dean Dickie said during his closing argument that “whenever there is an allegation or an accusation between a man and a woman about what happened in the privacy of their bedroom ... inevitably it turns into ‘it was all the woman’s fault, and the man was the victim of something that was made up.’”

He said O’Brien had been “psychologically scarred” by being violently held to the terms of a “slave contract” that required her to address her husband as “master” and parade around the house naked, adding that other women would be at risk if Anderson was not held liable.

But representing Anderson, Charles Cole said O’Brien’s account was “a fantasy ­— it’s a movie script.”

Arguing that O’Brien had lured Anderson into sadomasochism as part of a pre-planned “setup” to later sue him, Cole showed a large naked photo of an apparently unhurt and smiling O’Brien taken hours after the alleged honeymoon assault.

In an awkward aside, he conceded that Anderson was “no Romeo ... not when you compare to the physical allure of Ms. O’Brien.”

O’Brien had told a “bald-faced lie” when she “coldly” hid an abortion from Anderson, he added, claiming that was the real reason the “narcissistic” O’Brien was psychologically damaged.

Speaking later, after the verdict, he said Anderson was “very glad it’s over.”

But Cole added that he didn’t know if his twice-divorced client intends to remarry.

“I don’t know — he’s had a difficult experience,” he said.



© 2014 Sun-Times Media, LLC. All rights reserved. This material may not be copied or distributed without permission. For more information about reprints and permissions, visit www.suntimesreprints.com. To order a reprint of this article, click here.