suntimes
SOGGY 
Weather Updates

Honestly? Is this Abe’s hat?

The Abraham Lincoln hcollecti Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library Museum Springfield.  |  Rich Hein~Sun-Times

The Abraham Lincoln hat in the collection of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum in Springfield. | Rich Hein~Sun-Times

storyidforme: 43615021
tmspicid: 10651982
fileheaderid: 4887393
Article Extras
Story Image

Updated: February 28, 2013 6:58AM



SPRINGFIELD — For the next six months, the presidential museum honoring Abraham Lincoln wants visitors to believe one thing when they see the iconic $6.5 million beaver-fur stovepipe hat put on display this past week.

The hat was his. Really.

To mark Lincoln’s 204th birthday, the museum is bringing the hat out of storage for the first time since the Chicago Sun-Times last April questioned the prized showpiece’s authenticity and for the first time disclosed holes in its provenance.

But not even the slightest doubt is reflected on the sign now attached to the hat’s display case. The placard that went up with the hat on Wednesday explains its background in eight sentences, noting that only three of Lincoln’s famous stovepipe hats are known to exist: “2 silk ones from his last days of life, and this.”

“There’s no deception at all,” said Chris Wills, a spokesman for the museum.

What isn’t mentioned is any reference to the fact the state can’t prove whether it truly belonged to Honest Abe or whether the story about Lincoln giving this particular stovepipe hat to a southern Illinois farmer is real or a hoax.

One nationally recognized expert in historical artifacts and a Republican state senator with family ties to a close Lincoln associate both told the Chicago Sun-Times Friday they think the museum should give visitors the unvarnished truth about what one termed the hat’s “murky” past.

“I think the label should at least say ‘purportedly worn by Lincoln,’” said Wes Cowan, co-host of the PBS-TV show “History Detectives” and an expert in historical artifacts and owner of a Cincinnati auction house.

“I think they should tell museum visitors, ‘Look, there are a number of different stories about this hat, and here they are. Could this have been one of his hats? Here’s what we know. We tried to find out, but we can’t ever say for sure,’” said Cowan, who also made clear he isn’t saying the hat is a fake.

What is known is the hat bears the mark of a Springfield hat maker from whom Lincoln was known to have purchased hats, and it is Lincoln’s hat size.

But from there, its story hits bumps. The hat has been described alternately as one Lincoln wore and gave away in Washington, D.C., to farmer William Waller during the Civil War — the version a Waller relative laid out in a 54-year-old affidavit — and, more recently, as one that Lincoln turned over to Waller as a token of appreciation after an 1858 debate in southern Illinois with Stephen Douglas.

If one of those scenarios is true, the other can’t be.

Lincoln wasn’t known to give away his hats, and no evidence has been unearthed that placed William Waller in Washington, D.C., after Lincoln was elected president. Further, after his election, Lincoln never returned to Illinois before his assassination.

Wills said those kinds of details normally wouldn’t accompany one of the museum’s important relics when it goes on display, and there isn’t a need to bore down any deeper now into the hat’s cloudy history.

“These sorts of small signs on an item would not normally go into an item’s provenance. They’re simple descriptive labels. This is not an in-depth focus on just the hat or the history of it and the ins and outs of it,” Wills said. “The museum is comfortable that the authenticity has been established. There’s just not any question to inform people as far as we understand it.”

Last year, Cowan called the hat’s provenance “squishy,” and the museum’s curator, James Cornelius, acknowledged that “something of a historic liberty” had been taken in determining that Lincoln must have given Waller the hat in 1858 after the debate with Douglas in Downstate Jonesboro.

That explanation runs counter to the first written documentation on the hat from August 1958, when Carbondale resident Clara Waller signed an affidavit that said her father-in-law, William Waller, obtained the hat from Lincoln “during the Civil War in Washington” and, upon Waller’s death, it was passed on to her husband, Elbert Waller.

The hat remained in Waller’s family until 1958, when James Hickey, then head of the Illinois State Historical Library and overseer of the state’s Lincoln artifacts, purchased it from Clara Waller for an undisclosed price for himself in a move that today would almost assuredly spark ethical questions. The hat changed hands again in 1990, when Lincoln collector Louise Taper bought it from Hickey for an undisclosed price. She, in turn, parted with it in 2007, selling it to the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library Foundation as part of a $23 million haul of Lincoln memorabilia in 2007.

The purchase was proclaimed a coup for the museum.

The foundation has whittled down its debt for the collection to $13.6 million, according to its annual report for 2012.

But questions about the hat’s provenance appear to have made the foundation that owns the hat and Taper Collection skittish. A confidential May 2012 report prepared by the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency’s top lawyer and obtained by the Sun-Times said the foundation indicated that reporting on the hat’s murky history, in part, had “a potential impact on their efforts to raise funds to pay off the remaining debt relating to the Taper Collection.”

Wills said the foundation would not divulge whether fund-raising efforts took a serious hit later in 2012 as a direct result of reporting on the hat.

“The foundation doesn’t wish to discuss its fundraising,” he said.

At least one foundation donor, state Sen. Kirk Dillard (R-Hinsdale), shares the view that more detailed information about what he called the hat’s “murky” provenance needs to be displayed now to museum visitors during its upcoming lengthy display.

Dillard’s wife is the great-great granddaughter of former Illinois Gov. Richard Oglesby, who was the eulogizer at Lincoln’s funeral and the last person to have met with Lincoln at the White House before his assassination.

“I have great confidence that that hat did belong to Abraham Lincoln,” said Dillard, who is eying a run for governor in 2014. “But like a religious site in the Middle East, you need to know the full story so you can draw your own

conclusions. That hat has historic significance. But the public, in fine print, should be told that the title is murky.

“If you’ve got a cloudy title on something like that, which is just iconic, you’ve got to say here it is,” Dillard said.



© 2014 Sun-Times Media, LLC. All rights reserved. This material may not be copied or distributed without permission. For more information about reprints and permissions, visit www.suntimesreprints.com. To order a reprint of this article, click here.